Qualitative analysis

References

  • Alexa, M., & Zuell, C. (1999). Commonalities, differences and limitations of text analysis software: The results of a review. Mannheim: ZUMA. Disponível AQUI
  • Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I.,Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (1994). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Buckingham, England: Open U Press.
  • Barbier, R. (2002). A pesquisa-ação. Brasília, DF: Plano.
  • Bauer, M. W., & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). (2002). Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes. (original 2000).
  • Bernard, H. R. (1995). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.
  • Brandão, C. R. (Org.). (1981). Pesquisa participante. São Paulo, SP: Brasiliense.
  • Brandão, C. R. (org.). (1984). Repensando a pesquisa participante. São Paulo, SP: Brasiliense.
  • Bryman, A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: a question of method or epistemology? Teh British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75-92.
  • Carlson, R. G., Siegal, H. A., Wang, J., & Falck, R. S. (1996). Attitudes toward needle “sharing” among injection drug users: Combining qualitative and quantitative research methods. Human Organizations, 55(3), 361-369.
  • Carvalho da Silva, R. (1998). A falsa dicotomia qualitativo-quantitativo: paradigmas que informam nossas práticas de pesquisa. Em G. Romanelli & Z, M. M. Biasoli-Alves (Eds.), Diálogos metodológicos sobre práticas de pesquisa. Ribeirão Preto, SP: Ed. Legis Summa.
  • Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (2nd Ed. – 2001).
  • Eisner, E. W., & Peshkin, A. (Eds.). (1990). Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate. New York: Teachers College.
  • Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Ethnography. EM L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applpied social research methods (pp. 473-504). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fielding, N., & Schreier, M. (2001, Feb). On the compatibility between qualitative and quantitative research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [On-line Journal], 2(1). Avaiable at http://qualitative-research/fqs/fqs-eng.htm
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Discovery of substantive theory: A basic strategy underlying qualitative research. The American Behavioral Scientist, 8(1), 5-12.
  • Günher, H. (2004). Pesquisa qualitativa vs. pesquisa quantitativa: esta é a questão? (Série: Planejamento de Pesquisa nas Ciências Sociais, Nº 07). Brasília, DF: UnB, Laboratório de Psicologia Ambiental. Disponível na URL http://www.psi-ambiental.net/pdf/07QualQuant.pdf
  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-611.
  • Jorgensen, D. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Kelly, R. F. (1985). Family policy analysis: The need to integrate qualitative and quantitative research methods. Sociological Methods & Research, 13(3), 363-386.
  • Kidder, L. H., & Fine, M. (1997). Qualitative inquiry in psychology: A radical tradition. Em D. Fox & I. Prilleltensky (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 34-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. (Sage University Papers Series on Qualitative Research Methods, Vol 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Krippendorf, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Laurie, H., & Sullivan, O. (1991). combining qualitative and quantitative data in the longitudinal study of household allocations. Sociological Review, 39(1), 113-130.
  • Lazarsfeld, P. (1944). The controversy over detailed interviews: An offer for negotiation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 8, 38-40.
  • Link, H. C. (1943). An experiment in depth interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 7, 267-279.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (1998). Designing a qualitative study. EM L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 69-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mayring, Ph. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung [Introdução à pesquisa social qualitativa]. Weinheim: Beltz.
  • McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (Eds.). (1969). Issues in participant observation: A text and reader. New York: Random House.
  • McClintock, Ch. C., Brannon, D., & Maynard-Moody, S. (1979). Applying the logic of sample surveys to qualitative case studies: The case cluster method. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 612-629.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Newman, I., & Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois U Press.
  • Mohler, P. Ph. (1981). Zur Pragmatik qualitativer und quantitativer Sozialforschung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 33, 716-734.
  • Myers, V. (1977). Toward a synthesis of ethnographic and survey methods. Human Organization, 36, 244-251.
  • Neumann, K. (1987). Quantitative and qualitative approaches in educational research – problems and examples of controlled understanding through interpretive methods. International Review of Education, 33, 159-170.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Payne, S. L. (1951). The art of asking questions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton U Press.
  • Pereira, J. C. R. (1999). Análise de dados qualitativos: estratégias metodológicas para as ciências da saúde, humanas e sociaas. São Paulo: EDUSP.
  • Romanelli, G. (1998). A entrevista antropológica: troca e alteridade. EM G. Romanelli e Z. M. M. Biasoli-Alves (Eds.), Dialogos metodológicos sobre prática de pesquisa (pp. 119-133). Ribeirão Preto, SP: USP Pós-graduação em Psicologia.
  • Scaparo, H. (Org.). (2000). Psicologia e pesquisa: perspectivas metodológicas. Porto Alegre, RS: Ed. Sulina.
  • Schroeder, H. W. (1991). Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 231-248.
  • Sells, S. P., Smith, T. E., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1995). Integrating qualitative and quantitative research methods: A research model. Familiy Process, 34, 199-218.
  • Sieber, S. D. (1973). The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1335-1359.
  • Silva, R. C. (1998). A falsa dicotomia qualitativo-quantitativo: paradigmas que informam nossas práticas de pesquisa. EM G. Romanelli e Z. M. M. Biasoli-Alves (Eds.), Dialogos metodológicos sobre prática de pesquisa (pp. 159-174). Ribeirão Preto, SP: USP Pós-graduação em Psicologia.
  • Skott, H. E. (1943). Attitude research in the Department of Agriculture. Public Opinion Quarterly, 7, 280-292.
  • Smith, J. A., Harré, R., & Langenhove, L. V. (Eds.). (1996). Rethinking methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Social Science Research Council (SSRC). (1954). Narrowing the gap between field studies and laboratory experiments in social psychology: A statement by the summer seminar. Items, 8(4), 37-42.
  • Spink, M. J. (Ord.), (1999). Práticas discursivas e produção de sentidos no cotidiano: aproximações teóricas e metodológicas. São Paulo, SP: Cortez.
  • Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. (Sage University Papers Series on Qualitative Research Methods, Vol 48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1998). Focus group research: Exploratory and discovery. EM L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 505-526). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Thiollent, M. (1985). Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. São Paulo, SP: Cortez.
  • Webb, E., J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Weitzman, E. A., & Miles, M. B., (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis: A software sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Whyte, W. F. (Ed.). (1991). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wilson, T. P. (1982). Qualitative “oder” quantitative Methoden in der Sozialforschung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 34, 487-508.
  • Wolcott, H. F. (1990). Writing up qualitative research. (Sage University Papers Series on Qualitative Research Methods, Vol 20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Yin, R. K. (1998). The abridged version of case study research: Design and methods. EM L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 229-259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Magazines

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s